While HEDP is a highly effective and widely used scale inhibitor, it has several key disadvantages and limitations that must be considered for its proper application.
Here are the main disadvantages or limitations of HEDP:
1. Poor Chlorine Tolerance (Oxidative Stability)
This is the most significant limitation of HEDP.
-
The Problem: When exposed to oxidizing biocides (like chlorine, bromine, or ozone) commonly used in cooling water systems, HEDP degrades.
-
Consequences:
-
Loss of Efficacy: The degraded HEDP loses its scale inhibition capability, leading to potential scale formation.
-
Formation of Orthophosphate (PO₄³⁻): The breakdown product is orthophosphate, which can react with calcium to form extremely tenacious calcium phosphate scale. This scale is very difficult to remove and can be more problematic than the original scale HEDP was meant to prevent.
-
Nutrient for Microbes: Orthophosphate can act as a nutrient, promoting microbial growth (biofouling).
-
2. Low Calcium Tolerance Compared to Newer Phosphonates
-
The Problem: HEDP has a threshold for calcium tolerance. In water with very high calcium hardness, HEDP itself can form a calcium-HEDP complex that precipitates out of solution.
-
Consequences:
-
Self-Induced Fouling: This precipitation can create a soft, gel-like or solid deposit, which acts as foulant on heat exchanger surfaces.
-
Loss of Active Ingredient: The precipitated HEDP is no longer available to inhibit scale, reducing its effectiveness in the system water.
-
-
Comparison: This is a key area where PBTCA outperforms HEDP, as PBTCA’s “cage-like” structure gives it much higher calcium tolerance.
3. Potential to Form Problematic Salts
-
The Problem: Beyond calcium, HEDP can form insoluble salts with other multivalent cations under certain conditions.
-
Consequences:
-
Iron Fouling: It can form an insoluble salt with ferric ions (Fe³⁺). In systems with significant iron corrosion, this can lead to iron phosphonate fouling, which is often a reddish, sticky sludge.
-
4. Environmental Considerations (Biodegradability)
-
The Problem: HEDP is not readily biodegradable. Its C-P bond is very stable, making it persistent in the environment.
-
Consequences:
-
It can contribute to phosphorus loading in receiving waters, which is a concern in regions with strict regulations on nutrient discharge.
-
While it does not directly cause eutrophication like orthophosphate, its environmental persistence is a drawback compared to more readily biodegradable alternatives (e.g., polyaspartic acid).
-
5. Performance Limitations with Specific Scales
-
The Problem: While excellent against carbonate and sulfate scales, its performance can be less robust for certain types of scale.
-
Consequences:
-
Silica Scale: HEDP is not effective at controlling silica or silicate-based scales.
-
Calcium Phosphate Scale: As mentioned, it degrades into orthophosphate which promotes this scale, but even as an inhibitor, its performance against pre-existing phosphate ions is not as strong as some specialized polymers.
-
6. Viscosity in High-Concentration Formulations
-
The Problem: The acidic form of HEDP is very viscous, especially at high concentrations (e.g., 50-60% active).
-
Consequences: This high viscosity can make it difficult to handle, pump, and dilute, especially in cold weather.
Summary Table of Limitations
Limitation | Consequence | Mitigation / Alternative |
---|---|---|
Poor Chlorine Tolerance | Degrades, loses effectiveness, forms harmful calcium phosphate scale. | Use non-oxidizing biocides; feed HEDP downstream of chlorine injection; switch to a more oxidant-tolerant phosphonate like PAPEMP or PBTCA. |
Low Calcium Tolerance | Can precipitate as calcium-HEDP, causing self-fouling. | Not suitable for very high-hardness water. Use PBTCA instead. |
Forms Iron Salts | Can cause iron phosphonate fouling in systems with high iron. | Ensure good corrosion control; use dispersants to keep iron particles in suspension. |
Not Readily Biodegradable | Environmental persistence, potential regulatory issues. | Use only where discharge regulations allow; consider biodegradable alternatives for sensitive applications. |
Ineffective on Silica | Does not control silica scale. | Must be blended with specialized silica inhibitors if this is a problem. |
Conclusion
HEDP remains a powerful and cost-effective scale inhibitor for many applications. However, its susceptibility to oxidants like chlorine and its moderate calcium tolerance are its primary weaknesses. Understanding these limitations is crucial for designing an effective water treatment program. In modern formulations, HEDP is often blended with other chemicals (like PBTCA, polymers, and oxidant-stable corrosion inhibitors) to create a synergistic program that overcomes these individual shortcomings.