Skip to content
Water treatment agent researcher

Water treatment agent researcher

An interesting chemical engineer

How to test the anti-scaling effect of HEDP

Posted on September 8, 2025 By admin No Comments on How to test the anti-scaling effect of HEDP

Testing the anti-scaling effect of HEDP (Hydroxyethylidene Diphosphonic Acid) is a multi-step process that can range from simple laboratory jar tests to complex pilot-scale simulations. The choice of method depends on the required accuracy, available resources, and the specific system conditions you are trying to mimic.

Here is a detailed guide on how to conduct these tests, from basic to advanced.


1. Core Principle of Testing

The fundamental principle is to create scaling conditions in a controlled environment, introduce HEDP, and then quantify the amount of scale that forms compared to a blank test without inhibitor. The reduction in scale formation directly demonstrates HEDP’s efficacy.

2. Key Factors to Control in Any Test

To get accurate and reproducible results, you must control these parameters:

  • Water Chemistry: Precisely define the concentrations of scaling ions (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, CO₃²⁻, SO₄²⁻, HCO₃⁻, SiO₂). Use reagent-grade chemicals in distilled or deionized water to create synthetic water.

  • HEDP Dosage: Test a range of concentrations (e.g., 1, 2, 5, 10 mg/L active) to find the minimum effective dose.

  • Temperature: Higher temperatures generally accelerate scaling. Use a water bath or incubator.

  • pH: pH drastically affects scaling, especially for carbonate scales. Use buffers (e.g., borate buffer) to maintain a constant pH.

  • Time: The test must run long enough for scaling to occur in the blank.

  • Mixing: Gentle agitation simulates flow conditions and prevents stagnation.


3. Common Testing Methods

Here are the most practical methods, from simplest to most sophisticated.

Method 1: Static Jar Test (The Most Common & Simple Method)

This is a great starting point for a quick comparison.

Procedure:

  1. Prepare Synthetic Water: Create two identical solutions with high scaling potential.

    • Solution A (Cation): Contains CaCl₂, MgCl₂, etc.

    • Solution B (Anion): Contains NaHCO₃, Na₂SO₄, etc.

  2. Dosing: Add the desired dose of HEDP to Solution B. Leave another sample of Solution B without HEDP as a blank.

  3. Combining: Quickly pour Solution A into the dosed and blank Solution B jars. This mixing induces super-saturation.

  4. Incubation: Seal the jars and place them in a constant temperature water bath (e.g., 60°C / 140°F) for a set period (e.g., 24 hours).

  5. Analysis: After the time has elapsed, filter the solution through a pre-weried 0.45 μm membrane filter.

  6. Quantification:

    • Gravimetric Analysis: Weigh the dried filter paper with the scale. The difference from its initial weight is the mass of scale formed. Compare the mass in the blank jar vs. the jar with HEDP.

    • Chemical Analysis: Measure the residual calcium concentration in the filtered water using EDTA titration or an ICP-OES instrument. A higher residual calcium level in the HEDP-dosed sample indicates effective scale inhibition.

Calculation:
Inhibition Efficiency (%) = [ (M_blank – M_HEDP) / M_blank ] × 100
where M_blank is the mass of scale in the blank jar and M_HEDP is the mass in the dosed jar.

Method 2: Dynamic Tube-Blocking Test (More Advanced & Accurate)

This method dynamically simulates the conditions inside a heat exchanger pipe and is the industry standard for evaluating scale inhibitors.

Procedure:

  1. Setup: Two pumps precisely deliver the cation (Solution A) and anion (Solution B) solutions into a mixing coil.

  2. Injection: A syringe pump injects a concentrated HEDP solution into one of the streams at a controlled rate.

  3. Heated Tube: The mixed solution flows through a narrow, temperature-controlled stainless steel or capillary tube, which represents the heat exchanger tube.

  4. Pressure Monitoring: A pressure sensor monitors the pressure drop across the tube. As scale forms on the walls of the tube, the diameter decreases, causing the pressure drop to increase.

  5. Measurement: The test measures the time taken for the pressure drop to reach a certain value (e.g., 1 psi above baseline). The longer it takes, the more effective the inhibitor (HEDP).

Advantage: This method provides a highly sensitive and real-time measurement of scale inhibition under flowing, heated conditions that closely mimic reality.

Method 3: Electrochemical Scaling Test

This method uses the change in electrochemical behavior at a metal surface to detect scale formation.

Procedure:

  1. Setup: A working electrode (e.g., a metal disc) is immersed in the scaling water solution.

  2. Application: A potentiostat applies a small potential or current to the electrode.

  3. Measurement: As scale deposits on the electrode surface, it interferes with the electrochemical reaction (e.g., the redox reaction of a ferrocyanide/ferricyanide couple). This change is measured as a change in limiting current or impedance.

  4. Analysis: The rate of current decrease is correlated to the rate of scale formation. The presence of an effective inhibitor like HEDP will significantly slow down this rate of change.

Advantage: Very fast results (minutes to hours) and highly sensitive to the initial stages of scale formation.


4. Step-by-Step Summary for a Basic Jar Test

  1. Define Goal: Determine the effective dose of HEDP for a water with [Ca²⁺] = 400 mg/L and [HCO₃⁻] = 200 mg/L at pH 9.0 and 60°C.

  2. Prepare Solutions:

    • Solution A (Calcium): Dissolve CaCl₂·2H₂O in DI water to get [Ca²⁺] = 800 mg/L.

    • Solution B (Alkalinity + HEDP): Dissolve NaHCO₃ in DI water to get [HCO₃⁻] = 400 mg/L. Add a pH 9.0 buffer. Divide into several jars. Add different doses of HEDP (0, 1, 2, 5 mg/L) to each jar.

  3. Mix & Incubate: Combine equal volumes of Solution A and each Solution B jar. Place all jars in a 60°C water bath for 24 hours.

  4. Filter and Weigh: Filter each solution through pre-weighed filters. Dry the filters and weigh them.

  5. Calculate & Conclude: Calculate the inhibition efficiency for each HEDP dose. You will likely find that scale formation decreases as the HEDP dose increases, with 5 mg/L likely showing >95% inhibition.

By following these methods, you can scientifically and accurately determine the anti-scaling performance of HEDP for your specific application. For critical applications, the Dynamic Tube-Blocking Test is highly recommended.

Work Tags:HEDP

Post navigation

Previous Post: Can HEDP•Na4 Granule be used in daily chemicals?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories

  • Biocide and Algicide
  • Built Scale & Corrosion Inhibitors and Pretreatment Filming Agents
  • Casual
  • Corrosion Inhibitors & Oxygen Scavenger
  • Corrosion Inhibitors & Oxygen Scavenger
  • Life
  • Phosphonates Antiscalants
  • Polycarboxylic Antiscalant and Dispersant
  • Reverse Osmosis Chemicals
  • Salts of Phosphonates
  • Salts of Phosphonates
  • Surfactant & Others
  • Uncategorized
  • Work

档案

  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
HEDP的车间

Recent Posts

  • How to test the anti-scaling effect of HEDP
  • Can HEDP•Na4 Granule be used in daily chemicals?
  • Is HEDP expensive to use?
  • What is the addition concentration of HEDP•Na4 Granule?
  • Performance and application of GLDA.Na4

Recent Comments

  1. admin on Is Food Additive Sodium Polyacrylate Harmful to Human Body

Copyright © 2025 Water treatment agent researcher.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme